Feed on:
Posts
Comments

I found an interesting new (beta launched 2/13/2007) search engine called hakia. From the looks of it, they’re rolling their own solution on semantic-based stuff. Here’s a blurb from their site:

The basic promise is to bring search results by meaning match - similar to the human brain’s cognitive skills - rather than by the mere occurrence (or popularity) of search terms. hakia’s new technology is a radical departure from the conventional indexing approach, because indexing has severe limitations to handle full-scale semantic search.

Interestingly, they purposefully call out specific uses in which they believe their solution is particularly well-suited:

hakia’s capabilities will appeal to all Web searchers - especially those engaged in research on knowledge intensive subjects, such as medicine, law, finance, science, and literature.

I hammered on it for a bit, and it does look like it’s got some good feet under it. I’ll try replacing it as my go-to search site for a while and see how it goes (similar to what I did with AltaVista when I found Google in 1997 - never to look back). More on the experiment - if it develops.

I turned up a short counter-point blog post about their approach by Marc Fawzi and ToxicWave:

We are beginning to see search engines that claim they can semantic-ize arbitrary unstructured “Wild Wild Web” information. Wikipedia pages, constrained to the Wikipedia knowledge management format, may be easier to semantic-ize on the fly. However, at this early stage, a better approach may be to use human-directed crawling that associates the information sources with clearly defined domains/ontologies.

I like that idea… at least until the machines are smart enough to push aside their masters (as anyone who reads science fiction knows they’ll do eventually).

For those of you following the debate, I’m sure you’ve got an opinion about it. Few people I talk to seem to be indifferent to it; they tend to be either an ontology cheerleader or are highly skeptical it’ll be possible to get everyone on board. There’s a related (and often confused) discussion between the relationship between it and (fortunately, I think the dust is starting to settle on that argument).

Now, for the reason of this post. I just wanted to draw attention to what I believe to be the most cogent description of the Semantic Web and it’s attendant accoutrements. Specifically, some of the on-point posts in Nova Spivak’s blog, Minding the Planet. He’s an excellent communicator, and presents well-reasoned comments (ie. not vitriolic rhetoric), even though he does have an agenda to promote his stealth-mode Radar Networks company which appears positioned squarely in the Semantic Web space.

While you could browse through his blog to find the nuggets, here’s a short list of posts I’ve found to be interesting:

These posts and the Wikipedia articles seem to be as good a primer on the concepts as are to be found. Flavors of the debate range outside these, of course (and everyone seems to have some opinion about them), but I’d say, “FiDO, we’re go for Semantic Web.” (Realizing there might be some scrubs along the way to T-0.)